Image: © UK Parliament via Flickr

Universal Credit (the government’s benefit system) is really rubbish, says Corbyn

During Prime Ministers Questions, Jeremy Corbyn told Theresa May her welfare policy is 'inflicting misery'

Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn had their big old weekly theatre rehearsal, sorry, comedy ad-lib session, sorry Prime Minister’s Questions (affectionately known as PMQs) in the House of Commons yesterday and they talked about some economics.

During yesterday’s back and forth Corbyn mentioned a bunch of fairly weighty organisations (including the National Farmers’ Union and the Royal Society of Arts) and said they all thought that the government’s benefits system (Universal Credit) was “flawed and failing hundreds of thousands of people both in work and out of work.”

Theresa May said this new system of giving welfare payments encouraged rather than discouraged people into work (hinting the previous system did the opposite) and it “made sure that work always pays”.

Dealing with unemployment benefits and other types of welfare is known as “public economics”. Political parties typically (evidently) have different opinions about what systems work, and what’s fair.

Referencing the government's promise that universal credit would lift 350,000 children out of poverty, Corbyn maintained that some are saying that current system will actually increase the number of children in poverty.

They both stood their corner and made sure we heard what they wanted us to hear, anyway.

Recent articles

Reader Comments

  • RW

    Your right to a degree. You mentioned “the wandering Jew”.

    I elaborate that the Jewish people, historically have tended to migrate almost exclusively to locations that are economically and culturally vibrant already. I would speculate that Jews have thrived in these places and have often improved the bounds of their economies and knowledge base.

    You can also ask; how many massive entertainment conglomerates, Nobel winners or billionaires has Isreal developed? If Jews are so capable, why isn’t Tel Aviv the Rome of our time?

    Jews are successful because they value education, maintain a strong social cohesive, they actively monitor and have a good sense for Zeitgeist wherever they are and they carefully choose the places they settle and congregate themselves heavily in these choice locations.

    But most importantly (haulocaust increased the importance of this aspect), they actually designed their culture for success. They not only attend Harvard, they use what they learned to better the group as a whole. With as much, they studied intricate networking systems, adapted to it and in many cases improved upon them. (See how Japan acquired Aegis warships and made them better).

    Of course there is nothing wrong with any of this. It’s when you elaborately gain disproportionate power in any society where you would stand out, you must take care when attempting to make a society better (Civil Rights movement) and rewriting that society all together (mass immigration). Ask blacks in China, Mexico, Philippines or India how much opportunity they have? Go to businesses owned by their American diaspora and see how many blacks they hire. Go to Silicon Valley and see how many East or South Asian tech workers wish they could work with more black people. California might work as a state, but as a nation, I think your rolling the nuclear dice here. I hope we can succeed as a tolerant pluralistic superpower but at this stage in human societal development, it’s a pipe dream.

    And if Jews really are the icon for success, they would see that fundamental human successes happen over generations. Just look at the rest of the planet? Are we ready?