sewer2
Image: © Noel Jenkins

Thames Water has put up Londoners’ bills to give more money to investors

Water bills are going up by £13 a household

The UK capital’s new super sewer isn’t finished, but Thames Water has already upped Londoners water bills to give money to the project’s investors.

What it means: Imagine that you want to build a gigantic sewer but you don’t have the £4.2 billion it’ll cost just lying around. What should you do? Facing that very dilema, Thames Water did what lots of companies do: they went and asked a bunch of people to give them the money. And to make people keen to part with their cash, they promised to pay them interest, or give them an extra bit of money every year until the original loan was paid back.

These interest payments added up to £51.6 million last year. Thames Water realised it didn’t have that sort of money lying around either, so to get it the company decided to put up the prices it charges Londoners for their water. Water bills are expected to go up by about £13 a household by 2020 (to about £25 a year).

By and large, economists are pretty chill about businesses taking out loans and paying interest on them. The idea is that interest incentives those people who have money they’re not using to invest it in things that end up creating lots of value for everyone. In this case, Londoners all get a cleaner Thames. But Thames Water is a monopoly, which means their customers don’t have anyone else to buy their water from (and it’s not really an item you can do without). So Londoners have no choice but to accept the higher bill payments even if they think - as many do - that the super-sewer is unnecessary and a waste of money. For many people, having to pay for something they didn’t want and which isn’t even built yet seems pretty unfair.

Read our explainers on interest rates and monopolies.

Recent articles

Reader Comments

  • RW

    Your right to a degree. You mentioned “the wandering Jew”.

    I elaborate that the Jewish people, historically have tended to migrate almost exclusively to locations that are economically and culturally vibrant already. I would speculate that Jews have thrived in these places and have often improved the bounds of their economies and knowledge base.

    You can also ask; how many massive entertainment conglomerates, Nobel winners or billionaires has Isreal developed? If Jews are so capable, why isn’t Tel Aviv the Rome of our time?

    Jews are successful because they value education, maintain a strong social cohesive, they actively monitor and have a good sense for Zeitgeist wherever they are and they carefully choose the places they settle and congregate themselves heavily in these choice locations.

    But most importantly (haulocaust increased the importance of this aspect), they actually designed their culture for success. They not only attend Harvard, they use what they learned to better the group as a whole. With as much, they studied intricate networking systems, adapted to it and in many cases improved upon them. (See how Japan acquired Aegis warships and made them better).

    Of course there is nothing wrong with any of this. It’s when you elaborately gain disproportionate power in any society where you would stand out, you must take care when attempting to make a society better (Civil Rights movement) and rewriting that society all together (mass immigration). Ask blacks in China, Mexico, Philippines or India how much opportunity they have? Go to businesses owned by their American diaspora and see how many blacks they hire. Go to Silicon Valley and see how many East or South Asian tech workers wish they could work with more black people. California might work as a state, but as a nation, I think your rolling the nuclear dice here. I hope we can succeed as a tolerant pluralistic superpower but at this stage in human societal development, it’s a pipe dream.

    And if Jews really are the icon for success, they would see that fundamental human successes happen over generations. Just look at the rest of the planet? Are we ready?